group, | even | though | both | are |
owned | by | the | same | state |
and | what | is | more | are |
dialectically | united | by | their | interest |
in | maintaining | high | oil | prices |
on | the | world | market. | Each |
particular | industry's | security | service | combats |
the | threat | of | sabotage, | while |
organizing | it, | when | necessary, | against |
their | rivals: | a | company | with |
important | interests | in | undersea | tunnels |
will | be | favorably | disposed | to |
the | hazards | of | ferries | and |
may | bribe | newspapers | in | financial |
trouble | to | ensure | they | spot |
these | hazards | without | delay | and |
without | too | much | reflection; | a |
company | competing | with | Sandoz | will |
be | indifferent | to | underground | springs |
in | the | Rhine | valley. | Secrets |
are | subject | to | secret | surveillance. |
Thus | each | of | these | organizations, |
all | subtly | united | around | the |
executives | of | raison | d'etat, | aspires |
to | its | own | private | hegemony |
of | meaning. | For | meaning | has |
been | lost | along | with | an |
identifiable | center. Going | from | success | to |
success, | until | 1968 | modern | society |
was | convinced | it | was | loved. |